{"id":285,"date":"2015-09-09T09:05:05","date_gmt":"2015-09-09T09:05:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mysis.dk\/?page_id=285"},"modified":"2015-09-09T09:05:05","modified_gmt":"2015-09-09T09:05:05","slug":"humaniora-videnskab-eller-varm-luft-hvad-bogen-indeholder","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/?page_id=285","title":{"rendered":"Humaniora &#8211; videnskab eller varm luft &#8211; hvad bogen indeholder"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Bogen `Humaniora &#8211; videnskab eller varm luft\u00b4.<\/h2>\n<p>Bogen `Humaniora &#8211; videnskab eller varm luft\u00b4 er en trykt bog p\u00e5 496 sider, heraf 428 sider tekst, mens resten er litteraturlister og stikordsregister.<\/p>\n<h2>Kort resum\u00e9 af bogens hovedindhold<\/h2>\n<p>Bogens emne er en kritik af de sociale og humane videnskaber, som de bedrives p\u00e5 danske universiteter og i udlandet. I disse videnskaber udf\u00f8res der en hel del god og l\u00f8dig forskning; men der foreg\u00e5r ogs\u00e5 meget der er s\u00e5 svagt funderet, at det ikke fortjener betegnelsen videnskab.<\/p>\n<p>En meget stor del af alt hvad der publiceres inden for de sociale og humane videnskaber, er baseret p\u00e5 tankes\u00e6t der g\u00e5r under betegnelser som postmodernisme, poststrukturalisme og socialkonstruktionisme. Vurderet ud fra hvilke v\u00e6rker der citeres oftest p\u00e5 verdensplan, g\u00e6lder det for lidt over halvdelen af al `forskning\u00b4 p\u00e5 feltet, lige som danske forskere p\u00e5 feltet baserer sig mere p\u00e5 disse tankes\u00e6t end p\u00e5 noget andet. Men ved en kritisk genneml\u00e6sning af de vigtigste v\u00e6rker inden for socialkonstruktionisme, videnssociologi, k\u00f8nsforskning m.m. kan man konstatere, at der simpelt hen ikke er nogen evidens for de p\u00e5stande, der frems\u00e6ttes i disse b\u00f8ger. Det har snarere karakter af varm luft eller en gang Kejserens nye Kl\u00e6der. Man m\u00e5 undre sig over, hvorfor forskere p\u00e5 feltet ikke ud\u00f8ver intern kritik og punkterer de mest oppustede p\u00e5stande. Men da det ikke sker, er der et stort ud\u00e6kket behov for at andre, der ser p\u00e5 feltet udefra, kommer med den n\u00f8dvendige kritik \u2013 s\u00e5dan som det sker i denne bog.<\/p>\n<p>Bogen omtaler hvad der er de s\u00e6rlige form\u00e5l med humaniora og kritiserer mangelen p\u00e5 kriterier for hvorn\u00e5r en tese er sand. Flere kapitler handler om k\u00f8nsforskning. De sidste kapitler i bogen handler bl.a. om Linda Koldau-sagen og Lomborg-sagen \u2013 specielt om den forskellige holdning blandt naturvidenskabsfolk og folk p\u00e5 de human-sociale videnskaber til Lomborg.<\/p>\n<p>Bogen har ikke nogen veldefineret m\u00e5lgruppe, men sigter dog is\u00e6r p\u00e5 at udvikle mere kritisk sans hos folk der studerer eller arbejder med humaniora. Naturvidenskabsfolk og andre som kommer i konflikt med humanisters verdensopfattelse, kan ogs\u00e5 have nytte af at l\u00e6se den.<\/p>\n<p>Bogens emne er en kritik af de sociale og humane videnskaber, som de bedrives p\u00e5 danske universiteter og i udlandet. I disse videnskaber udf\u00f8res der en hel del god og l\u00f8dig forskning; men der foreg\u00e5r ogs\u00e5 meget der er s\u00e5 svagt funderet, at det ikke fortjener betegnelsen videnskab.<\/p>\n<p>En meget stor del af alt hvad der publiceres inden for de sociale og humane videnskaber, er baseret p\u00e5 tankes\u00e6t der g\u00e5r under betegnelser som postmodernisme, poststrukturalisme og socialkonstruktionisme. Vurderet ud fra hvilke v\u00e6rker der citeres oftest p\u00e5 verdensplan, g\u00e6lder det for lidt over halvdelen af al `forskning\u00b4 p\u00e5 feltet, lige som danske forskere p\u00e5 feltet baserer sig mere p\u00e5 disse tankes\u00e6t end p\u00e5 noget andet. Men ved en kritisk genneml\u00e6sning af de vigtigste v\u00e6rker inden for socialkonstruktionisme, videnssociologi, k\u00f8nsforskning m.m. kan man konstatere, at der simpelt hen ikke er nogen evidens for de p\u00e5stande, der frems\u00e6ttes i disse b\u00f8ger. Det har snarere karakter af varm luft eller en gang Kejserens nye Kl\u00e6der. Man m\u00e5 undre sig over, hvorfor forskere p\u00e5 feltet ikke ud\u00f8ver intern kritik og punkterer de mest oppustede p\u00e5stande. Men da det ikke sker, er der et stort ud\u00e6kket behov for at andre, der ser p\u00e5 feltet udefra, kommer med den n\u00f8dvendige kritik \u2013 s\u00e5dan som det sker i denne bog.<\/p>\n<p>Bogen omtaler hvad der er de s\u00e6rlige form\u00e5l med humaniora og kritiserer mangelen p\u00e5 kriterier for hvorn\u00e5r en tese er sand. Flere kapitler handler om k\u00f8nsforskning. De sidste kapitler i bogen handler bl.a. om Linda Koldau-sagen og Lomborg-sagen \u2013 specielt om den forskellige holdning blandt naturvidenskabsfolk og folk p\u00e5 de human-sociale videnskaber til Lomborg.<\/p>\n<p>Bogen har ikke nogen veldefineret m\u00e5lgruppe, men sigter dog is\u00e6r p\u00e5 at udvikle mere kritisk sans hos folk der studerer eller arbejder med humaniora. Naturvidenskabsfolk og andre som kommer i konflikt med humanisters verdensopfattelse, kan ogs\u00e5 have nytte af at l\u00e6se den.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><b>INDHOLD<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>Introduktion\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 5<\/p>\n<p>1. Objekt- og subjektorientering\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 7<\/p>\n<p>2. Forskellige former for personlighed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 35<\/p>\n<p>3. Selvet\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 58<\/p>\n<p>4. Hensigt og mening\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 76<\/p>\n<p>5. De humane fags fundamentale svaghed\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 92<\/p>\n<p>6. Sandheden om H. C. Andersen\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 109<\/p>\n<p>7. Sandhedskriterier\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 126<\/p>\n<p>8. Relativisme\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 141<\/p>\n<p>9. Socialkonstruktionisme\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 153<\/p>\n<p>10. Diskursanalyse\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 174<\/p>\n<p>11. Humanisme og vulg\u00e6rhumanisme\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 184<\/p>\n<p>12. Antropologi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 195<\/p>\n<p>13. Hjernens forudprogrammering\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 212<\/p>\n<p>14. Mist\u00e6nkeligg\u00f8relsen af naturvidenskaberne\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 228<\/p>\n<p>15. Feministers kritik af naturvidenskab\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 247<\/p>\n<p>16. Postmodernisme\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 261<\/p>\n<p>17. Hvor er evidensen\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 276<\/p>\n<p>18. Afvisning af biologiens betydning\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 289<\/p>\n<p>19. Seksualadf\u00e6rd som social konstruktion\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 306<\/p>\n<p>20. K\u00e6rlighed og romantik\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 326<\/p>\n<p>21. Feministisk metode \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 342<\/p>\n<p>22. Feministisk talbehandling\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 355<\/p>\n<p>23. Anslag mod basale rettigheder\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 375<\/p>\n<p>24. Personsager ved et dansk universitet\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 406<\/p>\n<p>25. Sandt og usandt i Lomborg-sagen\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 427<\/p>\n<p>26. Lomborg-sagen \u2013 humanioras rolle\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 447<\/p>\n<p>27. Sammenfatning\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 461<\/p>\n<p>Register\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 480<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>PR\u00d8VEKAPITEL<\/h2>\n<p>Kapitel 27 giver en slags sammenfatning af hele bogens indhold. Det kan downloades gratis som pdf-fil <a href=\"http:\/\/mysis.dk.linux190.unoeuro-server.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/Humaniora_kapitel27_sammenfatning.pdf\">her<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bogen `Humaniora &#8211; videnskab eller varm luft\u00b4. Bogen `Humaniora &#8211; videnskab eller varm luft\u00b4 er en trykt bog p\u00e5 496 &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"spay_email":""},"tags":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/P9D7Tn-4B","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/285"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/285\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mysis.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}